Receive the latest blog posts via email!

Your email:

The Green Power Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

How imminent is peak oil?

  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook | Submit to Reddit reddit |  Add to delicious  delicious | Submit to Digg digg it 

Peak Oil

Peak oil is the point in time when global oil production reaches its maximum and enters into a permanent decline. The peak oil year of United States was 1970. It was accurately predicted by M. King Hubbert in 1956. According to Hubbert peak theory, the rate of oil production in any region tends to follow a bell-shaped curve. 

While the peak oil year for the world as a whole is a matter of intense debate, there have been numerous predictions over the years. The two variables that make the peak oil year tough to estimate is demand for oil (effected by population growth and economic development of countries like India and China) and technological advances. For instance, Canada has the world's largest deposits of oil sands. Not all of it is accessible however. But technological advances increase the amount under human reach year after year. 

Nevertheless, the predictions continue to roll out. A recent study by a German Military Think Tank leaked to the internet states that there is "some probability that peak oil will occur around the year 2010." If peak oil is in fact imminent, there will be very serious economic consequences - one other reason to support renewable energy. 

Photo credit: adpowers


Tags: 

Comments

Looking for green energy? Check here!
Posted @ Tuesday, September 14, 2010 3:49 PM by Jack
Hubbert of “Peak Oil” fame in his famous paper advocated nuclear power as a long term replacement for oil and coal. In fact, the actual title of the paper is “Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuels“. In this paper he predicted exponential growth in nuclear power production. In fact, his 1956 paper is as much an advocacy for nuclear power as it is an analysis of oil production projections. 
 
This begs the question “If Hubbert was a prophet of doom regarding oil; why not a prophet of energy salvation regarding nuclear power?” 
 
Put another way, Hubbert is lionized for a prediction that turned out to be correct so far regarding oil; while his prediction that was wrong concerning nuclear power is conveniently ignored.
Posted @ Saturday, October 09, 2010 11:16 PM by Scott Peterson
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics